Lewis v. The People of the State of California Superior Court for the County of San Joaquin
| Joel Ladon Lewis |
| The People of the State of California Superior Court for the County of San Joaquin |
| 3:2022cv04205 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| PSLC LLH |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed "Consent / Decline of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction" to Eastern District Court. Their case number: 2:22-cv-01307-WBS-DB. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2022) |
| Remark: mailed Decline to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction and envelope to United States District Court Eastern District of California. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2022) |
| Case transferred to the Eastern District of California. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022) |
| Filing 6 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Joel Ladon Lewis. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 7/22/2022. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Joel Ladon Lewis in Support of #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed byJoel Ladon Lewis. (Related document(s) #2 ) (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2022) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joel Ladon Lewis, CDCR # AD0585.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2022) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed byJoel Ladon Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. The People of the State of California Superior Court for the County of San Joaquin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joel Ladon Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The People of the State of California Superior Court for the County of San Joaquin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
