Shihab v. Clint Reilly Communications
| Jamil Gulmann Shihab and Jamil GS |
| Clint Reilly Communications doing business as SF Weekly doing business as sfweekly.com |
| 3:2022cv04247 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on October 21, 2022. A Joint Case Management Statement or dismissal due by 11/4/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2022) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement of the Action by Jamil Gulmann Shihab (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 9/12/2022) Modified on 9/12/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the Complaint as to Clint Reilly Communications answer now due 9/12/2022 re #1 Complaint filed by Jamil Gulmann Shihab. (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 8/11/2022) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jamil Gulmann Shihab. Clint Reilly Communications served on 7/22/2022, answer due 8/12/2022. (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 7/25/2022) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Clint Reilly Communications. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 10/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/21/2022 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) |
| Copy of #4 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Copyright Infringement emailed to Register of Copyrights Office. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Copyright Infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 7/21/2022) Modified on 7/21/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/22/2022: #1 Copyright Form) (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 7/21/2022) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jamil Gulmann Shihab (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 7/21/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement; Jury Trial Demanded against Clint Reilly Communications (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17373039.). Filed by Jamil Gulmann Shihab. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Burroughs, Scott) (Filed on 7/21/2022) Modified on 7/21/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
