Swinton v. Department of Justice et al
| Malik Haleem Swinton |
| Department of Justice and GEO Group |
| 3:2022cv04276 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Clerk's DECLINATION OF DEFAULT as to the Department of Justice. Requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4(i) not complete. The United States has 60 days to respond to service of a summons per Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) #15 )(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 16
Clerk's DECLINATION OF DEFAULT as to Geo Group. Service was not made on agent of service listed with the Florida Secretary of State, Division of Corporations. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) #14 )(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 15
First MOTION for Entry of Default Request filed by Malik Haleem Swinton. (Swinton, Malik) (Filed on 9/2/2022)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Malik Haleem Swinton. Responses due by 9/6/2022. (Swinton, Malik) (Filed on 8/31/2022) Modified on 8/31/2022 (far, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 13
CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have bee n served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Malik Haleem Swinton. Department of Justice served on 8/11/2022, answer due 9/1/2022; GEO Group served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons GEO Group) (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022)
|
|
Filing 11
Acknowledgment of Receipt Received from the USMS re Summons. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Malik Haleem Swinton.. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
COMPLAINT against Department of Justice, GEO Group. Filed byMalik Haleem Swinton. Consent/Declination due by 8/15/2022. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022)
|
|
Filing 8
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
Prepared USM Packet per ECF #5 Order. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Deft GEO Group, #2 AO440) (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER.The court directs the Clerk of Court to change the nature of the suit code to 440. The plaintiff did check the 550 box on the cover sheet but apparently is not in custody. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 5
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE. Complaint on Form due by 9/1/2022. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Malik Haleem Swinton. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
Letter from Malik Haleem Swinton to Northern District of California Courts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
