Hourigan v. Redgrave LLP et al
| Karen O'Brien Hourigan |
| Redgrave LLP and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. |
| 3:2022cv04303 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION to Extend Defendants' Responsive Pleading Deadline filed by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.. (Mirsch, Drake) (Filed on 9/15/2022) |
| Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2022) |
| Filing 22 Transcript of Proceedings held on 08/12/2022, before Judge Laurel Beeler. Court Reporter Ruth Levine Ekhaus, RMR, RDR, FCRR, CSR No. 12219, telephone number (415)336-5223/ruth_ekhaus@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re #19 Transcript Order, #21 Transcript Order ) Redaction Request due 9/19/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/27/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/25/2022. (Related documents(s) #19 , #21 ) (rre, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2022) |
| Filing 21 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on August 12, 2022 before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP, for Court Reporter Ruth Ekhaus. (Mirsch, Drake) (Filed on 8/23/2022) |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION to Extend Defendants' Responsive Pleading Deadline to September 15, 2022 filed by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP. (Mirsch, Drake) (Filed on 8/22/2022) |
| Filing 19 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 08/12/2022 before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler by Karen O'Brien Hourigan, for Court Reporter Ruth Ekhaus. (Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 8/18/2022) |
Filing 18
ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING ON TRO #4 . The court held a hearing on the motion for a TRO on 8/12/2022. All parties consented to magistrate-judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 10, 12.)At the hearing, the parties stipulated to stay the arbitration proceedings (including the scheduling conference) until after the court resolves the issues in a hearing that will follow a fully briefed motion for a preliminary injunction. The parties agreed that before the court hears the preliminary-injunction motion, it will consider its jurisdiction as a threshold issue. The parties agreed to confer on jurisdiction to see whether the Northern District is the right venue for the lawsuit. If they cannot agree, the defendants will move to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. That should be filed by the deadline for a responsive pleading on the ordinary five-week schedule under the local rules (meaning, the moving party notices the motion for any available Thursday at 9:30 a.m. at least five weeks after full briefing). The parties may stipulate to a different schedule, including a different briefing schedule. As described at the hearing, the court relies on the parties to notice motions and does not set anticipatory hearings. After resolving the jurisdictional challenge, the court - with input from the parties - will set a further briefing schedule for the preliminary-injunction motion. Also, this process is meant to allow the court to stage the case: jurisdiction issues first and then preliminary-injunction issues (including any motion to compel arbitration). The court also suggested at the conference that during their jurisdictional conference, the parties try to work out their disagreements on the merits of the disputes and mentioned the court's ADR options. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/12/2022)
|
| Filing 17 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Temporary Restraining Order Hearing - Non-evidentiary held via Zoom on 8/12/2022. Parties stipulate to maintain the status quo and postpone the arbitration proceedings until after the court's resolution of the pending motion and any subsequent preliminary injunction motion. Court to issue order. Total Time in Court: 30 minutes. Court Reporter: Ruth Levine Ekhaus. Plaintiff Attorney: Karen O'Brien Hourigan. Defendants' Attorney: Vince Verde. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/12/2022) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Vince M. Verde (Verde, Vince) (Filed on 8/12/2022) |
| Filing 15 Brief re Plaintiff's Proposed Briefing and Hearing Schedule filed byKaren O'Brien Hourigan. (Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 8/11/2022) |
|
Order re #4 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. Temporary Restraining Order Hearing set for 8/12/2022 01:00 PM. The parties' competing proposals for briefing and a hearing are not reconcilable. The court sets a hearing to try to work out a schedule that allows briefing and maintains the status quo (as is typical with TROs).This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/11/2022)
|
| Filing 14 Brief Proposal re Briefing and Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed byOgletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP. (Mirsch, Drake) (Filed on 8/10/2022) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE: Now that all parties have consented, the usual process is for the parties to confer on a schedule for a preliminary injunction, generally to be heard within fourteen days. Often, the TRO can serve as the opening brief. This would put the matter on calendar for 8/25/2022 at 9:30 a.m. at the latest. The court asks the parties to confer on Wednesday, 8/10/2022 and to submit a joint proposal with their briefing and hearing schedules by the end of the day. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2022) Modified on 8/10/2022 (ejk, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Karen O'Brien Hourigan.. (Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 8/9/2022) |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP (Mirsch, Drake) (Filed on 8/8/2022) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP.. (Mirsch, Drake) (Filed on 8/8/2022) |
| Filing 9 ***INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED*** NOTICE by Karen O'Brien Hourigan Re Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 7/29/2022) Modified on 7/29/2022 (dhm, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety using correct event. Re: #9 Notice (Other) filed by Karen O'Brien Hourigan (dhm, CO URT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2022) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Per an email exchange, the plaintiff will serve the defendants with the condec notice and will notify the court if she wants the case reassigned. Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/9/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/9/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022) |
| Filing 4 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Karen O'Brien Hourigan. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Decl. of K, Hourigan, #3 Exhibit Hourigan Decl. Ex. 1, #4 Exhibit Hourigan Decl. Ex. 2, #5 Exhibit Hourigan Decl. Ex. 3, #6 Exhibit Hourigan Decl. Ex. 4, #7 Exhibit Hourigan Decl. Ex. 5, #8 Exhibit Hourigan Decl. Ex. 6, #9 Rule 65-1 Certification of Counsel, #10 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 7/26/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Karen O'Brien Hourigan (Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 7/26/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 7/26/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief against Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Redgrave LLP ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17382368.). Filed byKaren O'Brien Hourigan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hourigan, Karen) (Filed on 7/26/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
