Halafihi et al v. Walmart Inc.
| Siupeli Halafihi and T. T. |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 3:2022cv04443 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Western District of Missouri or the Western District of Arkansas filed by Walmart Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 10/28/2022 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 10/4/2022. Replies due by 10/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Donald F. Zimmer, Jr., #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Proposed Order)(Zimmer, Donald) (Filed on 9/20/2022) |
| Filing 22 Case Reassigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Judge Trina L. Thompson no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022) |
Filing 21
RELATED CASE ORDER. Maguire v Wal-mart Stores, Inc., 22-cv-03238 MMC, is related to Thompson v. Walmart Inc., 22-cv-03408 YGR, Bell v. Walgreens Boots Alliance and Walmart Inc., 22-cv-03882 YGR, Good v. Walmart Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, and CVS Health Corporation, 22-cv-04442 YGR, Halafihi v. Walmart Inc., 22-cv-04443 TRT, and Hillix v. Walmart Inc., 22-cv-04444 YGR. The Clerk of Court is ordered to reassign the later-filed actions to the undersigned. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 15, 2022. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF RELATED CASES PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 by Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Zimmer, Donald) (Filed on 9/8/2022) Modified on 9/9/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 19
Order by Trina L. Thompson granting #18 Stipulation to Extend Defendant's Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. (tltlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022)
|
| Filing 18 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Walmart Inc., Siupeli Halafihi, T.T. (Zimmer, Donald) (Filed on 9/2/2022) Modified on 9/2/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Taylor Stewart for Defendant Walmart Inc. (Stewart, Jennifer) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
| Filing 16 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES OR ENTITIES by Walmart Inc. (Zimmer, Donald) (Filed on 9/2/2022) Modified on 9/2/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald Frederick Zimmer, Jr for Defendant Walmart Inc. (Zimmer, Donald) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Siupeli Halafihi, T. T.. Walmart Inc. served on 8/15/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. (Baghdadi, Khaldoun) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Trina L Thompson. Judge Jon S. Tigar no longer assigned to the case. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2022) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Trina L. Thompson in the San Francisco division for all further proceedings. 1. All future filings shall bear the initials TLT immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court. 3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before Judge Thompson by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. 4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff remain unchanged.5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for or after November 15, 2022, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered.6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before November 15, 2022, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (e.g., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases.7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice.8. On or before October 14, 2022, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address all issues outlined in the #Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District. The approved form for such statements can be accessed # here.IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/29/2022 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (ecg-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #4 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advan ced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at JSTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than November 7, 2022 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov /zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 08/09/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Siupeli Halafihi, T. T... (Baghdadi, Khaldoun) (Filed on 8/8/2022) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Walmart Inc. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/15/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem filed by Siupeli Halafihi, T. T.. (Baghdadi, Khaldoun) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Siupeli Halafihi, T. T. (Baghdadi, Khaldoun) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Baghdadi, Khaldoun) (Filed on 8/1/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against Walmart Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17399942). Filed by Siupeli Halafihi, T. T. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baghdadi, Khaldoun) (Filed on 8/1/2022) Modified on 8/2/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
