Johnson v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
Jada Johnson |
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Altria Client Services, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Enterprises LLC, James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Nicholas Pritzker, Hoyoung Huh, Riaz Valani, Mother Murphy's Lab, Inc., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., eLiquitech, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC and Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc. |
3:2022cv04502 |
August 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jada Johnson Proof of Service of all defendants (Day, Justin) (Filed on 8/18/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. No title Page. Certificates/Proofs of Service e-filed separately and not as an attachment, require a title page. Please refer to Civil Local Rules 3-4 re first page requirement. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #6 Certificate of Service filed by Jada Johnson (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2022) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jada Johnson re #1 Complaint, #5 Summons Issued, (Coleman, Gregory) (Filed on 8/16/2022) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services, LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Hoyoung Huh, Juul Labs, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphy's Lab, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Riaz Valani, eLiquitech, Inc.. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Coleman, Gregory) (Filed on 8/5/2022) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Coleman, Gregory) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form Complaint against All Defendants with jury demand ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17412104.). Filed by Jada Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coleman, Gregory) (Filed on 8/4/2022) Modified on 8/4/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
#Electronic filing error. Document filed in wrong case. [err401] The case information on the document is incorrect. Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #3 Proposed Summons filed by Jada Johnson (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: EDWARD A. WALLACE. The docket shows a different address from what is appearing on the document (dkt. #: 1 Complaint filed by Ja da Johnson ). Please update your personal profile on ECF. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
DIRECT MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2913 Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-4502-WHO cc: JPMDL (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.