Ruiz v. Monsanto Company
| Irene C. Ruiz |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2022cv04716 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Irene C. Ruiz. Service waived by Monsanto Company waiver sent on 8/16/2022, answer due 10/17/2022. (Hendler, Scott) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 1:22-cv-00771. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 16-md-2741VC: Western Texas, 1:22-cv-00771, Ruiz v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 22-cv-4716 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 346 cc: JPMDL (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
| Filing 5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO - 364) entered by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel.(jv2) |
| Filing 4 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Irene C Ruiz. (Hendler, Scott) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/4/2022 to flatten document) (rn). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (jv2) |
| Notice of Correction: re #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. This filing includes a fillable form. Fillable Forms must be flattened to permanently affix any signatures, or other items added to the document to include the case style, party names, dates, etc. These steps should be performed prior to filing your documents through CM/ECF. Instructions are on the Courts website on the CM/ECF page under Training, Printing to PDF. The Clerks Office has flattened this form. No further action required. Please take note for future filing purposes. (jv2) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Irene C Ruiz. (Hendler, Scott) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/4/2022) (jv2). |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rn) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (rn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16332440). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Irene C Ruiz.(Hendler, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruiz v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Irene C. Ruiz | |
| Represented By: | Scott Martin Hendler, I |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
