Al Awdi v. Garland et al
| Mohammed Abdulmale Al Awdi |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and National Archives and Records Administration |
| 3:2022cv04987 |
| August 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/3/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry g enerated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File a Response and [Proposed] Order filed by Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Archives and Records Administration. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Archives and Records Administration.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mohammed Abdulmale Al Awdi. Merrick Garland served on 9/15/2022, answer due 11/14/2022; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 9/15/2022, answer due 11/14/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/15/2022, answer due 11/14/2022; National Archives and Records Administration served on 9/15/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Archives and Records Administration. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022) |
| Filing 4 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Defendants' Names and Addresses)(Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 9/7/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/15/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2022) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory Relief against Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, National Archives and Records Administration (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17496839). Filed by Mohammed Abdulmale Al Awdi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 8/31/2022) Modified on 9/7/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
