Kelly v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lawrence Wayne Kelly, Jr.
Defendant: Aramark Services, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv05263
Filed: September 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Referring Judge: Trina L Thompson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE RE Docket No. 27 in case no. 22-cv-1272-HSG. The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Claire Marie Lesikar (Lesikar, Claire) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
September 23, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah L. Zenewicz (Zenewicz, Sarah) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
September 19, 2022 Filing 10 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Trina L. Thompson upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Thompson's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov.Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/8/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2022 at 02:00 PM by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/trina-l-thompson.Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at tltcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Monday, December 12, 2022 by no later than 12:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Trina L. Thompson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 9/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
September 19, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
September 19, 2022 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lawrence Wayne Kelly, Jr.. (Patino, Jose) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 12/8/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. b> Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
September 15, 2022 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/8/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
September 15, 2022 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/29/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
September 15, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aramark Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Aramark, Other Affiliate Aramark Intermediate Holdco Corp. for Aramark Services, Inc.. re 1 Notice of Removal, (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
September 15, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Judicial Notice re 1 Notice of Removal, filed byAramark Services, Inc.. (Related document(s) 1 ) (Meckley, Eric) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
September 15, 2022 Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint byAramark Services, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Wayne Kelly, Jr.
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: Jose Maria Dominado Patino, Jr.
Represented By: Maxim Gorbunov
Represented By: Jose Maria Dominado Patino, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aramark Services, Inc.
Represented By: Eric Meckley
Represented By: Claire Marie Lesikar
Represented By: Sarah L. Zenewicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?