Yuksel v. Twitter Incorporated
Plaintiff: Edip Yuksel
Defendant: Twitter Incorporated
Case Number: 3:2022cv05415
Filed: September 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/6/2022. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 4:21-cv-00137. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting #18 Motion to Change Venue. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Change Venue/Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Doc. #18 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 09/21/2022. (See attached Order for complete information.) (SCA)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #28 MOTION to Strike #27 Response, Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Response to Twitter, Inc. filed by Edip Yuksel. (6 pages) (SCA)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Twitter Incorporated: Proof of Service re: [Dkt. 28] Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Response to Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and [Proposed] Order Granting Motion to Strike Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Response to Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss upon Edip Yuksel on 9/15/2022. (Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MOTION to Strike #27 Response, Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Response to Twitter, Inc. by Twitter Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Strike)(Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 SECOND RESPONSE to Twitter Inc re: #17 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P.12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities by Plaintiff Edip Yuksel. (6 pages) (SCA)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Twitter Incorporated: Proof of Service re: Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) upon Edip Yuksel on 8/11/2022. (Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #18 MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California filed by Twitter Incorporated. (Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #17 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P.12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Twitter Incorporated. (Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION To Deny Twitter Inc's Request To Change Venue; Request for Oral Argument and Jury Trial by Edip Yuksel. (2 pages) (SCA)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 RESPONSE to Motion re: #17 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P.12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Edip Yuksel. (44 pages) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(SCA)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until August 5, 2022 to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall file any reply within seven (7) days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 07/06/2022. (SCA)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Twitter Incorporated: Proof of Service re: Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6)); Declaration In Support [Dkt. 17]; Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 USC 1404(a); Declaration In Support; [Proposed] Order [Dkt. 18]; Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Request For Judicial Notice; Declaration In Support; [Proposed] Order [Dkt. 19] upon Edip Yuksel on 7/6/2022. (Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 REQUEST re: JUDICIAL NOTICE In Support of Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Dkt. 17] and Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) [Dkt. 18] by Defendant Twitter Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Request For Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Kenneth M. Trujillo-Jamison In Support of Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Request For Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by Twitter Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), #2 Declaration of Kenneth M. Trujillo-Jamison In Support of Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Case Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P.12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities by Twitter Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kenneth M. Trujillo-Jamison In Support of Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6))(Trujillo-Jamison, Kenneth)
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Twitter Incorporated: Proof of Service re: Applications of Attorney For Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice Pursuant to LRCiv 83.1(b)(2) of Eileen M. Ahern and Kenneth M. Trujillo-Jamison upon Edip Yuksel on 6/24/2022. (Kirk, Ashley)
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Eileen Ahern on behalf of Defendant Twitter Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Kenneth Michael Trujillo-Jamison on behalf of Defendant Twitter Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. #13 ) is granted. Twitter Incorporated shall respond to the Complaint on or before July 5, 2022. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 5/31/22. (JAM)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Twitter Incorporated. (Kirk, Ashley)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint by Twitter Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kirk, Ashley)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Ashley L. Kirk appearing for Twitter Incorporated. . (Kirk, Ashley)
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service upon Twitter Inc c/o John Montigo- CT Corporation Registered Agent on 05/12/2022. (SCA)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Summons Issued in person at the Customer Service Intake Counter as to Twitter Incorporated. (REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time for Service (Doc. #8 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with the Summons and Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is filed. Plaintiff is warned that this action may be dismissed if he does not serve Defendant within thirty days. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 04/13/2022. (SCA)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time for Service by Edip Yuksel. (2 pages) (SCA)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a response which (1) explains why he has not yet filed proof of proper service, and (2) shows good cause for an extension of the time limit for service under Rule 4(m). Failure to file a response showing good cause for an extension of the time limit for service will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 03/04/2022. (See attached Order for complete information.)(SCA)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Edip Yuksel: Certificate of Mailing upon Twitter Inc on 4/23/2021. (DLC)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number TUC032993. (BAC)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and the $52.00 administrative fee or file a non-prisoner Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. If Plaintiff fails to comply with the above-stated order within the 30-day time period, the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a court-approved nonprisoner Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 4/5/2021. (See attached Order for complete details)(DLC)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MCO)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Rosemary Marquez. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-21-137-TUC-RM. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edip Yuksel.(MCO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/31/2021: #1 Complaint with Case Number) (MCO).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yuksel v. Twitter Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edip Yuksel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twitter Incorporated
Represented By: Eileen Ahern
Represented By: Kenneth Michael Trujillo-Jamison
Represented By: Ashley Lynn Kirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?