Lombard Flats LLC et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Lombard Flats LLC and New Owners Group LLC
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Fay Servicing LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv05686
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE: On 11/9/2022, JP Morgan Chase filed a motion to dismiss that is set for a hearing on 12/15/2022. The deadline for the opposition was 11/23/2022, and the deadline for any amendment as of right (if that is available) was 11/30/2022. The plaintiff did not oppose the motion or file the required statement of non-opposition. In addition, the court issued four notices to the plaintiff about consent or declination of magistrate jurisdiction: one on 10/18/2022 with a deadline of 11/1/2022, a second on 11/7/2022 with a deadline of 11/21/2022, a third on 11/9/2022 with a shortened deadline of 11/16/2022 given the motion, and a fourth on 11/21/2022 with a deadline of 11/23/2022. The plaintiff did not respond to any of the notices. Any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms and attached. But parties must decide. Under the circumstances, the court keeps the hearing on calendar for 12/15/2022 and directs the plaintiff to file an update by COB on 12/2/2022 with any request for an extension for the motion and to file a consent/declination at the same time. If the plaintiff does not respond, it faces consequences that include sanctions and, ultimately, dismissal of the case for its failure to prosecute it. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2022)
November 30, 2022 Filing 15 Statement of Non-Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss - Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Notice of Plaintiffs Non-Opposition to its Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/30/2022)
November 21, 2022 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 11/23/2022 b>. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022)
November 9, 2022 Filing 13 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing #11 MOTION to Dismiss set for 12/15/2022 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 11/23/2022. Replies due by 11/30/2022. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://ww w.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2022)
November 9, 2022 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/16/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2022)
November 9, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. Motion Hearing set for 12/15/2022 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 11/23/2022. Replies due by 11/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order)(Freed, John) (Filed on 11/9/2022)
November 7, 2022 Filing 10 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/21/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2022)
October 19, 2022 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Fay Servicing LLC.. (Pelletier, Kristina) (Filed on 10/19/2022)
October 18, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendant Fay Servicing LLC shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/1/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1 8/2022)
October 14, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Fay Servicing LLC. (Pelletier, Kristina) (Filed on 10/14/2022)
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A... (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/6/2022)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 STIPULATION To Extend Time to Respond to Complaint Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/6/2022)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/19/2023 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 1/12/2023. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb Gener al Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2022)
October 5, 2022 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/29/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/5/2023 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2022)
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/17/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2022)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC 22-601504, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17588521). Filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #7 Notice of Interested Parties, #8 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Freed, John) (Filed on 10/3/2022) Modified on 10/5/2022 (tn, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lombard Flats LLC et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lombard Flats LLC
Represented By: Dennis Rasmussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: New Owners Group LLC
Represented By: Dennis Rasmussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Represented By: John Douglas Freed
Represented By: Brittni A. Hamilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fay Servicing LLC
Represented By: Kristina Marie Pelletier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?