Vowell v. Monsanto Company
William Vowell |
Monsanto Company |
3:2022cv05736 |
October 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff William Vowell] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 11/15/2022) |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff William Vowell] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 11/15/2022) |
Filing 8 Defendant Monsanto Company ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff William Vowell] byMonsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 11/15/2022) |
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Minnesota; Case Number 0:22-cv-02308. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 16-md-2741: Minnesota, 22-cv-2308 WMW JFD, Vowell v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-5736 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 355 cc: JPMDL (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2022) |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-355) transferring case to the Northern District of California per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria.(kt) |
Filing 5 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to JPML regarding case potentially related to MDL #2741 re: #1 Complaint. (MMP) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (MMP) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-2308 (WMW/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9776196) filed by William Vowell. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vowell v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William Vowell | |
Represented By: | Charles H. Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.