White v. Barbier Security et al
| Travis Tamu White |
| Barbier Security, Ford Greene ADI, San Rafael Police Department, San Rafael City Planner and Marin County District Attorney |
| 3:2022cv06025 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC AGB |
| Laurel Beeler |
| PSLC MWD |
| William H Orrick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 EXHIBITS re Bar Association, Ford Greene responses and my Opposition filed byTravis Tamu White. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2022) |
| Filing 10 EXHIBITS Documents/Evidence in my case filed by Travis Tamu White. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2022) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by Travis Tamu White. Responses due by 11/28/2022. Replies due by 12/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2022) |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 10/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/21/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 10/21/2022 (ljf, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Travis Tamu White. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Travis Tamu White. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/21/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Travis Tamu White. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee: IFPP). Filed by Travis Tamu White. Consent/Declination due by 11/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022) |
| Copies of docket sheet #3 Clerk's Notice re IFP and #4 Notice of Assignment mailed to plaintiff. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
