Castillo v. Kijakazi
| Marie K Castillo |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 3:2022cv06053 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark - Acknowledgment of receipt of email sent. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2022) |
| Remark - email sent. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2022) |
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge William H. Orrick. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2022)
|
| Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by Marie K Castillo Re: #1 Civil Cover. (Linden, David) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
| Electronic Filing Error. Case has been randomly assigned to judge, however, incorrect Civil Cover Sheet of JS 44 (Rev. 7/19) used at case opening. Please complete correct Civil Cover Sheet of JS-CAND 44 (Rev 10/2020) in its entirety and file as a separate docket entry re: 1 Re: #1 .{1} Civil Cover Sheet Complaint filed by Marie K Castillo (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2022) Modified on 10/17/2022 (sfb, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Linden, David) (Filed on 10/14/2022) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marie K Castillo. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of In Forma Pauperis Motion)(Linden, David) (Filed on 10/14/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi. Filed byMarie K Castillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Linden, David) (Filed on 10/14/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Castillo v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marie K Castillo | |
| Represented By: | David Joseph Linden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
