City of Central Falls et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
| City of Central Falls, City of Cranston, City of East Providence, City of Newport, City of Pawtucket, City of Warwick, City of Woonsocket, Town of Barrington, Town of Bristol, Town of Burrillville, Town of Charlestown, Town of Coventry, Town of Cumberland, Town of East Greenwich, Town of Foster, Town of Glocester, Town of Hopkinton, Town of Jamestown, Town of Johnston, Town of Middletown, Town of Narragansett, Town of North Kingstown, Town of North Providence, Town of Portsmouth, Town of Richmond, Town of Scituate, Town of Smithfield, Town of South Kingstown, Town of Warren, Town of West Greenwich, Town of West Warwick and Town of Westerly |
| McKinsey and Company, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv06073 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Rhode Island; Case Number 1:22-cv-00355. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED re MDL 2996: From District of Rhode Island, 1:22cv00355, City of Central Falls et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc., Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-06073-CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 30 cc: JPML (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2022) |
Filing 7
Conditional Transfer Order #30 Transferring this matter to the District of Northern California and assignment to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings. So Ordered by District Judge Mary S. McElroy on 10/12/2022. (Kenny, Meghan)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL entered. Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Mary S. McElroy for all further proceedings. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 10/3/2022. (Jackson, Ryan)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to McKinsey and Company, Inc. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (DaCruz, Kayla) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr.. (DaCruz, Kayla) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of James C. Peterson. So Ordered by Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. on 9/30/2022. (DaCruz, Kayla) Modified on 9/30/2022 to correct docket text. (DaCruz, Kayla)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for James C. Peterson to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( filing fee paid $ 100.00, receipt number ARIDC-1799184 ) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Feeney, Cassandra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 402.00, receipt number ARIDC-1799171 ), filed by Town of Westerly, Town of Narragansett, City of Woonsocket, Town of Scituate, Town of Hopkinton, City of Cranston, City of Central Falls, Town of Jamestown, Town of West Greenwich, Town of Glocester, Town of Smithfield, Town of Richmond, Town of South Kingstown, Town of Middletown, Town of East Greenwich, Town of Portsmouth, Town of Burrillville, Town of West Warwick, Town of Charlestown, Town of North Kingstown, Town of Cumberland, Town of North Providence, Town of Warren, City of Warwick, City of East Providence, Town of Bristol, Town of Coventry, Town of Foster, Town of Barrington, City of Newport, Town of Johnston, City of Pawtucket. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Summons)(Feeney, Cassandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
