Clark v. Commission on Judicial Performance et al
| Loureece Stone Clark |
| Commission on Judicial Performance, State Bar of California, Beth Schluter Jordan, Andrew Edward Sweet and James T. Chou |
| 3:2022cv06204 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| PSLC JNE |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Corrected plaintiff's inmate number (from 97365 to 238024).(ljf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2022) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/25/2022. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Loureece Stone Clark. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James T. Chou, Commission on Judicial Performance, Beth Schluter Jordan, State Bar of California, Andrew Edward Sweet. Filed by Loureece Stone Clark. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
