DiBenedetto v. JUUL Labs,Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and PLOOM Inc. et al
Anthony DiBenedetto |
JUUL Labs,Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and PLOOM Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Enterprises LLC, James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Nicholas Pritzker, Hoyoung Huh, Riaz Valani, Mother Murphy's Lab, Inc., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., eLiquitech, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores Inc., Speedway LLC, 7-Eleven, Inc., Walmart and Juul Labs, Inc. |
3:2022cv06213 |
October 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 7-Eleven, Inc., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Hoyoung Huh, JUUL Labs,Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and PLOOM Inc., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphy's Lab, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Speedway LLC, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Riaz Valani, Walmart. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2022) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Frazer, T. Roe) (Filed on 10/20/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. Issued date on summons must be blank. [err201] This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety Re: #2 Proposed S ummons filed by Anthony DiBenedetto. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2022) |
DIRECT MEMBER CASE OPENED: 19-2913 Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-6213-WHO cc: JPMDL (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2022) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Frazer, T. Roe) (Filed on 10/19/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Payment made $402, receipt number ACANDC-17641610 (with jury demand) against 7-Eleven, Inc., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Hoyoung Huh, JUUL Labs,Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and PLOOM Inc., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphy's Lab, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Speedway LLC, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Riaz Valani, Walmart, eLiquitech, Inc. Filed by Anthony DiBenedetto. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Frazer, T. Roe) (Filed on 10/19/2022) Modified on 10/20/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). Modified on 10/25/2022 (as, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.