ATTARI v. Mayorkas et al
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, UR MENDOSA JADDOU and MERRICK GARLAND |
| MARYAM ATTARI |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Justice |
| 3:2022cv07171 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by MARYAM ATTARI.. (Nasserian, Ira) (Filed on 12/17/2022) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/20/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2022) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOSA JADDOU, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Nasserian, Ira) (Filed on 11/19/2022) |
| Filing 6 ***ERRONEOUS ENTRY; PLEASE DISREGARD; COUNSEL TO RE-SUBMIT*** Summons Returned Unexecuted by MARYAM ATTARI as to MARYAM ATTARI. Alejandro Mayorkas (Nasserian, Ira) (Filed on 11/18/2022) Modified on 11/18/2022 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 ***ERRONEOUS ENTRY; PLEASE DISREGARD; COUNSEL TO RE-SUBMIT*** Proposed Summons. (Nasserian, Ira) (Filed on 11/18/2022) Modified on 11/18/2022 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/1/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by MARYAM ATTARI . (Nasserian, Ira) (Filed on 11/16/2022) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (no process) (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17729010). Filed by MARYAM ATTARI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit visa to US, #2 Exhibit Receipt of I-589, #3 Exhibit BIOMETRICS, #4 Exhibit work authorization, #5 Exhibit work authorization 1, #6 Exhibit notice of intent to file Mandamus, #7 Exhibit Affirmative interview, #8 Exhibit reschedule interview no officer)(Nasserian, Ira) (Filed on 11/15/2022) Modified on 11/17/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Sheet is missing. Please submit Civil Cover sheet. Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by MARYAM ATTARI (jrs, COURT STAFF) (F iled on 11/15/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
