Marin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
| Mel Marin |
| John Kallas, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Fidelity National Financial, Inc. doing business as Chicago Title, Clear Recon Corporation, John Bahr, John Saxe and Castle Breckenridge |
| 3:2022cv07234 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/8/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/15/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (Attachments: #1 DMR Statnding Order, #2 Standing Order for All Judges)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Bahr, Clear Recon Corporation, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., John Kallas, John Saxe, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. ; Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402., Receipt #34611162179). Filed by Mel Marin. Consent/Declination due by 11/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope, #3 Receipt)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
