Chegg, Inc. v. Doe
Plaintiff: Chegg, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 3:2022cv07326
Filed: November 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Referring Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting #14 Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery. (agtlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2023)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Supplemental Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery filed by Chegg, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas A. James, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Ridley, Eileen) (Filed on 12/19/2022)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting #9 Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery. (agtlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse for Discovery (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer: Granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice, Thomas A. James. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer: Granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice, Jami A. Gekas. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/8/2022. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2022)
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Ex Parte Application Motion for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery filed by Chegg, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas A. James, #2 Exhibit A to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #3 Exhibit B to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #4 Exhibit C to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #5 Exhibit D to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #6 Exhibit E to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #7 Exhibit F to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #8 Exhibit G. to Decl. of Thomas A. James, #9 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order)(Ridley, Eileen) (Filed on 12/7/2022)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17757213.) filed by Chegg, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(James, Thomas) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17757058.) filed by Chegg, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Gekas, Jami) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to John Doe. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 2/10/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2023 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2022)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Ridley, Eileen) (Filed on 11/18/2022)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17743141.). Filed byChegg, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ridley, Eileen) (Filed on 11/18/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chegg, Inc. v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chegg, Inc.
Represented By: Eileen Regina Ridley
Represented By: Jami A. Gekas
Represented By: Thomas A James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?