Rajagopalan et al v. Jaddou et al
Arun RAJAGOPALAN and Rukmini SIVARAMAN |
Director, USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Director, TSC, USCIS John M. Allen, Ur M. Jaddou and John M. Allen |
3:2022cv07507 |
November 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Alex G Tse |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse denying #10 Motion to Withdraw Complaint.(agtlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Complaint, filed by Arun Rajagopalan, Rukmini Sivaraman. Responses due by 1/26/2023. Replies due by 2/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Loughran, Robert) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to John M. Allen, Ur M. Jaddou. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2022) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Arun Rajagopalan, Rukmini Sivaraman.. (Loughran, Robert) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Loughran, Robert) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
Filing 6 Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting #4 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (agtlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2022) |
Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. REMINDER - Please do no capitalize party names, unless a business abbreviation. Corrections made by Clerk's Office Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Arun Rajagopalan, Rukmini Sivaraman (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2022) |
Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17771417.) filed by Arun RAJAGOPALAN. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Loughran, Robert) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/13/2022. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2022) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Arun RAJAGOPALAN, Rukmini SIVARAMAN . (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 11/29/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17764885.). Filed byArun RAJAGOPALAN, Rukmini SIVARAMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 11/29/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. Use October 2020 form which can be downloaded from https://cand.uscourts.gov/. No judge assignment will be made until t he document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Arun RAJAGOPALAN, Rukmini SIVARAMAN (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.