Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
| Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund, AFL-CIO Local 475 Health and Welfare Fund, Allied Security Health and Welfare Fund, Building Service Local 2 Welfare Fund, CWA Local 1181 Health Plan, CWA Local 1182 and 1183 Health and Welfare Funds, Drywall Tapers Insurance Fund 1974 - UIPAT District Council No. 9, IBEW Local 25 Health and Benefit Fund, International Brotherhood of Trade Unions Local 713 Health Plan, Iron Workers Local 361 Health Fund, Iron Workers Local 40 Health Fund, Iron Workers Local 417 Health Fund, Metallic Lathers and Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 46 Health and Benefit Fund, Iron Workers Local 580 Health and Benefit Fund, IUOE Local 138 Health Benefit Fund, Laborers Local 1298 of Nassau and Suffolk Counties Welfare Fund LIUNA, Laborers Local 235 Welfare Fund LIUNA, Local 342 United Marine Division Insurance Trust (ILA), Local 381 Group Insurance Fund (USWA), Westchester Heavy Construction Laborers Local 60 Health And Welfare Fund (LIUNA), Metal Polishers Local 8a-28a Welfare Fund (IUPAT), NOITU Insurance Trust Fund, Painting Industry Insurance Fund (Bridge Painters) Local 9, Roofers Local 8 WBPA Fund, Structural Steel Local 806 Health Plan, Suffolk Transportation Services; Inc., Teamsters Local 445 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Local 456 Welfare Fund, UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, UFCW Local 342 Healthcare Fund, UFCW Local 342 Welfare Fund, Uniformed Fire Officers Association Benefits Fund (UFOA 854), United Crafts Benefits Fund (UA 21 Plumbers and Steamfitters), United Wire, Metal And Machine Local 810 Health Benefit Fund (Teamsters) and UOPW Local 175 Welfare Fund (Journeymen And Allied Trades) |
| McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey & Company Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company Inc. Washington D.C. and McKinsey Holdings, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv07520 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of New York Eastern; Case Number 1:22-cv-06789. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED re MDL 2996: From Eastern District of New York, 1:22cv06789, Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-07520-CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 34 cc: JPMDL (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2022) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-34), Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of June 7, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned tothe Honorable Charles R. Breyer. (TL) |
| Filing 6 JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-34), Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of June 7, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. (TL) |
| Case transferred to Northern District of California. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (TL) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Letter MOTION for All Defendants Extension of Time to File Answer to the Complaint1, and a stay of further proceedings pending transfer to an MDL in California. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 11/13/2022. (MV)
|
| Filing 5 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,,, /David M. Cheifetz Unopposed Letter Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint and for a Stay of Further Proceedings by McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey Holdings, Inc.,. (Cheifetz, David) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Removal and Exhibits, Corporate Disclosure Statement and Civil Cover Sheet served on David Grossman, Esq. on November 8, 2022, filed by McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey Holdings, Inc.,. (Bernard, James) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD) |
| Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (KD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, case number 719535/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-16116484) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #4 Exhibit 2 - Purdue Voluntary Petition, #5 Exhibit 3 - Claim No. 119446, #6 Exhibit 4 - Claim No. 119184, #7 Exhibit 5 - Claim No. 122120, #8 Exhibit 6 - Claim No. 119705, #9 Exhibit 7 - Claim No. 119676, #10 Exhibit 8 - Claim No. 116322, #11 Exhibit 9 - Claim No. 121506, #12 Exhibit 10 - Claim No. 122257, #13 Exhibit 11 - Claim No. 117729, #14 Exhibit 12 - Claim No. 121895, #15 Exhibit 13 - Claim No. 120950, #16 Exhibit 14 - Claim No. 122096, #17 Exhibit 15 - Claim No. 122117, #18 Exhibit 16 - Claim No. 118425, #19 Exhibit 17 - Claim No. 122141, #20 Exhibit 18 - Claim No. 122132, #21 Exhibit 19 - Claim No. 122145, #22 Exhibit 20 - Claim No. 116084, #23 Exhibit 21 - Claim No. 122181, #24 Exhibit 22 - Claim No. 118929, #25 Exhibit 23 - Claim No. 119703, #26 Exhibit 24 - Claim No. 117070, #27 Exhibit 25 - Claim No. 119721, #28 Exhibit 26 - Claim No. 119540, #29 Exhibit 27 - Claim No. 113033, #30 Exhibit 28 - Claim No. 121301, #31 Exhibit 29 - Claim No. 116281, #32 Exhibit 30 - Claim No. 117090, #33 Exhibit 31 - Claim No. 119277, #34 Exhibit 32 - Claim No. 122168, #35 Exhibit 33 - Claim No. 122178, #36 Exhibit 34 - Claim No. 122221, #37 Exhibit 35 - Claim No. 118245, #38 Exhibit 36 - Claim No. 121797, #39 Exhibit 37 - Ex. 37 - Claim No. 119365) (Bernard, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
