Miele v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
| Cam Miele |
| JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Altria Enterprises, LLC, Altria Client Services, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Hoyoung Huh, Riaz Valani, Nicholas Pritzker, Mother Murphys Laboratories, Inc, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., Eliquitech, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC and Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv07580 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Adam Bowen, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services, LLC, Altria Enterprises, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Eliquitech, Inc., Hoyoung Huh, JUUL Labs, Inc., James Monsees, McLane Company, Inc., Mother Murphys Laboratories, Inc, Nicholas Pritzker, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Riaz Valani, Tobacco Technology, Inc., ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17777509.). Filed byCam Miele. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Neill, Alicia) (Filed on 12/1/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
