A. H. v. Anthem Blue Cross
Plaintiff: A H
Defendant: Anthem Blue Cross
Case Number: 3:2022cv07660
Filed: December 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2022 Filing 28 Case Transferred in from United States District Court for the District of Utah (Central); Case Number 2:22-cv-00184-TC-CMR. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER: this matter is to be transferred to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 12/2/22 (alt)
November 30, 2022 Filing 26 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #22 Order to Show Cause, filed by A. H.. (King, Brian)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting #23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss pending resolution of #22 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 11/21/22 (alt)
November 18, 2022 Filing 24 Motions No Longer Referred: #23 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support. (cff)
November 18, 2022 Filing 23 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero.(Shewan, Angela)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is to file response to this Order, or, in the alternative, a motion to transfer venue by 11/30/22. Dft may file a response to this order, also by 11/30/22. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 11/16/22 (alt)
November 7, 2022 Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff A. H.. (King, Brian)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time: Attorney Planning Meeting Report and proposed Scheduling Order are due within 14 days after the ruling on #18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/24/22 (alt)
October 21, 2022 Filing 19 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to file Attorney Planning Meeting Report and Proposed Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff A. H.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero.(King, Brian)
October 10, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Shewan, Angela)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/7/22 (alt)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Anthem Blue Cross - answer due 10/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/7/22 (alt)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Motion referred to Cecilia M. Romero. So ordered by Judge Tena Campbell on 10/5/22 (alt)
September 28, 2022 Filing 14 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to Complaint filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Shewan, Angela)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Anthem Blue Cross - answer due 10/3/2022. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 9/2/22 (alt)
September 1, 2022 Filing 12 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Shewan, Angela)
August 24, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela Shewan on behalf of Anthem Blue Cross (Shewan, Angela)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Anthem Blue Cross - answer due 9/2/2022. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 8/18/22 (alt)
August 18, 2022 Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marigoni, Nathan)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/20/22 (alt)
July 20, 2022 Filing 7 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 Complaint filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Marigoni, Nathan)
June 23, 2022 Filing 6 SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Nathan R. Marigoni replacing Timothy C. Houpt as counsel on behalf of Anthem Blue Cross. (Marigoni, Nathan)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Anthem Blue Cross - answer due 7/20/2022. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 6/8/22 (alt)
June 8, 2022 Filing 4 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint filed by Defendant Anthem Blue Cross. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Attorney Timothy C. Houpt added to party Anthem Blue Cross(pty:dft)(Houpt, Timothy)
April 13, 2022 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by A. H. as to Anthem Blue Cross Waiver sent on 4/13/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. (King, Brian)
March 21, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Anthem Blue Cross, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number AUTDC-4282812) filed by A. H.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (King, Brian)
March 21, 2022 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff A. H. is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: A. H. v. Anthem Blue Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A H
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthem Blue Cross
Represented By: Angela Shewan
Represented By: Nathan R. Marigoni
Represented By: Timothy C. Houpt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?