Keiser v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
| Matthew Keiser |
| JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Enterprises LLC, JAMES MONSEES, Adam Bowen, Nicholas Pritzker, Ho Young Huh, Riaz Valani, MOTHER MURPHYS LABS, INC., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., Eliquitech, Inc., McClane Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores, Inc., Speedway, LLC, 7-Eleven, Inc., Walmart, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc. and Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv08087 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 7-Eleven, Inc., Adam Bowen, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Eliquitech, Inc., Ho Young Huh, Juul Labs, Inc., McClane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Riaz Valani, Speedway, LLC, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Walmart, Inc. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022) |
| DIRECT MEMBER CASE OPENED RE: 3:19-md-02913-WHO. Opened in California Northern District as 3:22-cv-08087-WHO cc: JPMDL (gba-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Farnolo, Nicholas) (Filed on 12/12/2022) |
| Filing 1 SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against 7-Eleven, Inc., Adam Bowen, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Chevron Corporation, Circle K Stores, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Eliquitech, Inc., Ho Young Huh, James Monsees, Juul Labs, Inc. previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., McClane Company, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Riaz Valani, Speedway, LLC, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Walmart, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCANDC-17807223.). Filed by Matthew Keiser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Farnolo, Nicholas) (Filed on 12/12/2022) Modified on 12/19/2022 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
