Tron v. Robertson et al
| Sergio Tron |
| Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues, Richard Hawwa, Paul Dalglish, Pat Grady, Chris Jarratt, Brandon Moak, Robert Schaefer, Brad Sparkes and Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II |
| 3:2022cv08634 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting (45) Administrative Motion to Relate in case 3:22-cv-02090-JSC. 22-cv-7526 & 22-cv-8634 are related to this action. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2023)
|
| Filing 18 Case Reassigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Judge William Alsup no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2022) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting (28) Stipulation Consolidating Related Actions; Setting a Schedule; Accepting Service, and Appointing Co-Lead Counsel in case 3:22-cv-05455-JSC (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2022)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by The Clerk on 12/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2022)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Sergio Tron of the Filing of the Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related in 3:22-cv-02090-JSC (Rosen, Laurence) (Filed on 12/21/2022) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2022) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II.. (Muck, Kevin) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Madeeha Dean (Dean, Madeeha) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Bradford-Shivers (Bradford-Shivers, Jordan) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica L. Lewis (Lewis, Jessica) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan Samuels Muck (Muck, Susan) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Peter Muck (Muck, Kevin) (Filed on 12/20/2022) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergio Tron. Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II served on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023. (Rosen, Laurence) (Filed on 12/16/2022) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Paul Dalglish, Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II, Pat Grady, Richard Hawwa, Chris Jarratt, Ken Manget, Brandon Moak, Ian Robertson, Alex Rodrigues, Robert Schaefer, Brad Sparkes. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/7/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/27/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Sergio Tron (Rosen, Laurence) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Rosen, Laurence) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Paul Dalglish, Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II, Pat Grady, Richard Hawwa, Chris Jarratt, Ken Manget, Brandon Moak, Ian Robertson, Alex Rodrigues, Robert Schaefer, Brad Sparkes ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17816248.). Filed bySergio Tron. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosen, Laurence) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
