Carroll v. Mattel Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Keith Carroll
Defendant: Mattel Inc. and American Girl Brands LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv08954
Filed: December 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Referring Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Carroll. Mattel Inc. served on 12/27/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. (Ferrell, Scott) (Filed on 1/17/2023)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by The Clerk on 01/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)
January 11, 2023 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2023)
January 11, 2023 Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by American Girl Brands LLC, Mattel Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and Civil Local Rule 3-15 (Singh, David) (Filed on 1/11/2023)
January 10, 2023 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by American Girl Brands LLC, Mattel Inc... (Singh, David) (Filed on 1/10/2023)
January 10, 2023 Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by American Girl Brands LLC, Mattel Inc.. (Singh, David) (Filed on 1/10/2023)
January 1, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Carroll. American Girl Brands LLC served on 12/21/2022, answer due 1/11/2023. (Ferrell, Scott) (Filed on 1/1/2023)
December 20, 2022 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Keith Carroll.. (Ferrell, Scott) (Filed on 12/20/2022)
December 20, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to American Girl Brands LLC. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022)
December 20, 2022 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Ferrell, Scott) (Filed on 12/20/2022)
December 19, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mattel Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022) Modified on 12/20/2022 (cv, COURT STAFF).
December 19, 2022 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/22/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022)
December 19, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/3/2023. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2022)
December 19, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Ferrell, Scott) (Filed on 12/19/2022)
December 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17834819.). Filed byKeith Carroll. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ferrell, Scott) (Filed on 12/19/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carroll v. Mattel Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Carroll
Represented By: Scott J. Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mattel Inc.
Represented By: David Ramraj Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Girl Brands LLC
Represented By: David Ramraj Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?