Cash v. Gilead Sciences Inc. et al
| Diana Carol Cash |
| Gilead Sciences Inc and Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP Attorney |
| 4:2022cv08970 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #18 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Erik Anielak.(mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17984054.) filed by Gilead Sciences Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Eric M, Anielak for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Anielak, Eric) (Filed on 2/13/2023) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric M. Anielak (Anielak, Eric) (Filed on 2/13/2023) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Eugene Anderson on Behalf of Defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Anderson, Joshua) (Filed on 2/10/2023) |
| Filing 15 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options filed by Diana Carol Cash. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2023) |
| Filing 14 Received Documents from Diana Carol Cash. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2023) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Diana Carol Cash.. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2023) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by The Clerk on 01/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RELATING CASES. Motions terminated: (1110 in 4:18-cv-06972-JST) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Gilead Sciences, Inc., (1109 in 4:18-cv-06972-JST) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by Gilead Sciences, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 12, 2023. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/25/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/20/2022. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 1/3/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 7
NOTICE AND ORDER:The attached notice and order notifies the plaintiff of resources available, attaches the district's handbook for litigants who do not have a lawyer, includes a flyer for contacting the court's help desk and instructs the plaintiff about serving the defendants. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Self Help Flyer, #2 Pro Se Handbook)(ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/16/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/23/2023 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 5 Case Transferred in from United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn); Case Number 1:22-cv-07607-EK-LB. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: Without offering any opinion on the merits of the action, the action is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. That provision of Rule 83.1 of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of New York, which requires a seven-day delay, is waived. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 12/16/2022. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. Case transferred electronically to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California via CM/ECF Extract Civil Case. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (WL)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Diana Carol Cash. (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gilead Sciences Inc., Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP Attorney, filed by Diana Carol Cash. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
