Matter of Hyo Geun Kim
| Matter of Hyo Geun Kim |
| Google LLC |
| 3:2022mc80169 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Matter of Hyo Geun Kim UNITED STATES OF AMERICAS NOTICE OF GOOGLES COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA AND THAT CASE CAN BE CLOSED (Brakebill, Kenneth) (Filed on 8/31/2022) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 7/22/2022. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2022)
|
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Google LLC identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Other Affiliate XXVI Holdings Inc for Google LLC. (Schwartz, Julie) (Filed on 7/21/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Google LLC.. (Schwartz, Julie) (Filed on 7/21/2022) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie Erin Schwartz for Non-Party Google LLC (Schwartz, Julie) (Filed on 7/21/2022) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Matter of Hyo Geun Kim (Brakebill, Kenneth) (Filed on 7/19/2022) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING CONSENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 7/11/2022. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matter of Hyo Geun Kim.. (Brakebill, Kenneth) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Petitioner shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/21/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/21/2022. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2022) |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS MATTER: UNOPPOSED APPLICATION OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 (Filing fee $ 49.). Filed by Matter of Hyo Geun Kim. (Attachments: #1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF UNOPPOSED APPLICATION OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782, #2 Declaration OF KENNETH W. BRAKEBILL IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Brakebill, Kenneth) (Filed on 7/6/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Matter of Hyo Geun Kim | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matter of Hyo Geun Kim | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Warren Brakebill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Interested party: Google LLC | |
| Represented By: | Julie Erin Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
