In the Matter of David Benjamin Kaplan SBN 154254
Respondent: David Benjamin Kaplan
Case Number: 3:2022mc80175
Filed: July 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF SUSPENSION re #1 Order to Show Cause,, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/7/2022. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Suspension from Membership in Good Standing of the Bar of the Court. Show Cause Response due by 8/26/2022. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/14/22. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2022) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/14/2022: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (gba, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of David Benjamin Kaplan SBN 154254
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Benjamin Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?