Tesla, Inc. v. Berkley Assurance Company
| Tesla, Inc. |
| Berkley Assurance Company |
| 3:2023cv00069 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Trina L Thompson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byBerkley Assurance Company. (Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 2/14/2023) |
| Filing 12 CLERKS NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Trina L. Thompson upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Thompsons Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/13/2023 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/6/2023. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.u scourts.gov/trina-l-thompson/Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at TLTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 4/6/2023.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscour ts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 1/18/2023) |
| Filing 11 Case reassigned to District Judge Trina L Thompson. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by the Clerk on 1/18/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2023) (bw, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2023) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Berkley Assurance Company.. (Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 1/17/2023) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Berkley Assurance Company re #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines (Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Berkley Assurance Company re 4 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 1/9/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/4/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2023 01:30 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/20/2023. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2023) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Berkley Assurance Company . (Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 1/6/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Berkley Assurance Company identifying Corporate Parent W.R. Berkley Corporation for Berkley Assurance Company. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 1/6/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV407757. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17876870). Filed byBerkley Assurance Company. (Attachments: #1 copy of Complaint attached - Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 copy of Answer attached- Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Cope, Stephen) (Filed on 1/6/2023) Modified on 1/6/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
