Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ian Martin Garcia |
| Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) |
| 3:2023cv00131 |
| January 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #11 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023) Modified on 3/7/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER filed by Commissioner of Social Security, Ian Martin Garcia. (Darcher, Edmund) (Filed on 3/3/2023) Modified on 3/6/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ian Martin Garcia.. (Barasch, Stuart) (Filed on 2/6/2023) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 2/3/2023. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2023)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/17/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2023) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security.. (Darcher, Edmund) (Filed on 2/3/2023) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2023) |
| Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
| SSA served via ECF per Supplemental Rule for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) rule 3. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2023)
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/25/2023. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2023) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ian Martin Garcia. (Barasch, Stuart) (Filed on 1/11/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Review of a Social Security Decision against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed byIan Martin Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(Barasch, Stuart) (Filed on 1/11/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
