Jones v. City of Oakland
| Theo Cedar Jones |
| City of Oakland |
| 3:2023cv00166 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| William H Orrick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
USCA Case Number 23-15340 9th Circuit for #13 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit, filed by Theo Cedar Jones. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Theo Cedar Jones. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Theo Cedar Jones. Appeal of Order on Motion for TRO, #12 (IFP Request was previously e-filed with the Court). (Attachments: #1 Appellants opening brief, #2 Motion of dissolution of TRO) (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023)
|
|
Filing 12
Order Dissolving TRO by Judge William H. Orrick re: #3 Motion for TRO. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 11
Letter: Supplemental Complaint. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2023)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to City of Oakland. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND GRANTING #4 IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION by Judge William H. Orrick. The Temporary Restraining Order Hearing in related Case No. 23cv35 has now been continued to February 3, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. via Zoom videoconference. Jones may also appear at the TRO hearing on February 3, 2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 1/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Related Order - The attached order was entered in Case No. 23cv35-WHO as Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/06/2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RELATING CASE to Cases No. 22cv4178-WHO and 23cv35-WHO. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/13/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (jmd, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 5
Sua sponte referral to determine whether case number 23-cv-00166 is related to case number 23-cv-00035. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 13, 2023. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive for mailing on 1/13/2023 Modified on 1/13/2023 (klh, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Theo Cedar Jones. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Theo Cedar Jones. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/7/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/14/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Oakland. Filed byTheo Cedar Jones. Consent/Declination due by 1/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. City of Oakland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Theo Cedar Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Oakland | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
