George Beltran v. PeopleReady, Inc. et al
| George Beltran |
| PeopleReady, Inc. and TrueBlue, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00179 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Labor: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 REPLY (re #19 MOTION to Remand ) filed byGeorge Beltran. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Glugoski, John) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 24 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING - Motion Hearing as to #19 MOTION to Remand and #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Case Management Conference reset for 4/19/2023 02:00 PM. This proceeding will be held via Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/who General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2023) |
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #19 MOTION to Remand ) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand filed byPeopleReady, Inc., TrueBlue, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Vince Vargas in support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand)(Ongaro, David) (Filed on 2/22/2023) |
| Filing 22 REPLY (re #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) filed byPeopleReady, Inc., TrueBlue, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jesse Angeles in support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Declaration of Jeroen Decker in support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Ongaro, David) (Filed on 2/21/2023) |
| Filing 21 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING ZOOM HEARING - Motion Hearing as to #19 MOTION to Remand and #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration reset for 3/29/2023 02:00 PM via Videoconference. This proceeding will be held via Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/who General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2023) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration ) filed byGeorge Beltran. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Reuben Nathan Associates, Inc. In Support of Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Glugoski, John) (Filed on 2/14/2023) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Remand filed by George Beltran. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 2/22/2023. Replies due by 3/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Glugoski, John) (Filed on 2/8/2023) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by George Beltran re #17 Case Management Scheduling Order (Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 2/7/2023) |
Filing 17
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2023 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2023. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/07/2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by The Clerk on 02/06/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2023)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2023) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by PeopleReady, Inc... (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 2/3/2023) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANTS Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 2/7/2023. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Order re #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by PeopleReady, Inc.. (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 11 Declaration of Adam Mering in Support of #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed byPeopleReady, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #10 ) (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by PeopleReady, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2023 01:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 2/14/2023. Replies due by 2/21/2023. (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by George Beltran.. (Righetti, Matthew) (Filed on 1/26/2023) |
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/12/202 3. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2023 01:30 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2023) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/7/2023. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Attorney Carey A. James has been entered on the docket but the profile needs to be updated as the docket shows that he is with the law firm of Aiman- Smith and Marcy. Attorneys are reminded to update the ECF account if there's a change of firm name or address. Re: #5 Notice of Appearance filed by PeopleReady, Inc., TrueBlue, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2023) |
| Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet by PeopleReady, Inc. . (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/20/2023) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Raymond Ongaro on behalf of Defendants Peopleready, Inc. and Trueblue, Inc. (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/13/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. Use October 2020 form which can be downloaded from https://cand.uscourts.gov/. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by PeopleReady, Inc., TrueBlue, Inc. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2023) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by PeopleReady, Inc. and TrueBlue, Inc. (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David Raymond Ongaro (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Vince Vargas in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byPeopleReady, Inc.. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/12/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County. Their case number is 22CV021265. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17896199). Copy of Complaint attached. Filed by PeopleReady, Inc., TrueBlue, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ongaro, David) (Filed on 1/12/2023) Modified on 1/13/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
