Allen v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
| Jesse Allen |
| Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation |
| 3:2023cv00414 |
| January 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Trina L Thompson |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byJesse Allen. (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 3/20/2023) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byBoston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Suzanne Hove)(Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 3/13/2023) |
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing as to #16 MOTION to Remand . Motion Hearing set for 6/13/2023n is re-set for 6/27/2023 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before District Judge Trina L Thompson. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 2/28/2023) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Jesse Allen. Motion Hearing set for 6/13/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before District Judge Trina L Thompson. Responses due by 3/13/2023. Replies due by 3/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lux, Talia) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jesse Allen (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| Filing 14 REPLY (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities ) filed byBoston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. (Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities ) filed byJesse Allen. (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 2/17/2023) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE RE-SETTING Motion Hearing as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities. Motion Hearing set for 5/2/2023 is re-set for 5/9/2023 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before District Judge Trina L Thompson. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 2/6/2023) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 5/2/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before District Judge Trina L Thompson. Responses due by 2/17/2023. Replies due by 2/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Motion to Strike Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) AND 12(F))(Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 2/3/2023) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Boston Scientific Corporation Notice of Compliance (Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 9 CLERKS NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Trina L. Thompson upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Thompsons Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2023 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/20/2023.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.u scourts.gov/trina-l-thompson/General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry ge nerated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Trina L Thompson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 01/31/2023. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2023)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Boston Scientific Corporation.. (Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/20/202 3. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2023 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/10/2023. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2023) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 1/27/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 1/27/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Mateo Superior Court. Their case number is 22-CIV-05487. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17937320). Filed byBoston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration of Nancy Moorman, #4 Declaration of Suzanne Hove, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Barbara) (Filed on 1/27/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
