Bei v. Mayorkas et al
Ni Bei |
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Danielle E. Lehman |
3:2023cv00613 |
February 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Joseph C Spero |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Status Report due by 8/15/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2023) |
Filing 11 Order. Signed 3/14/2023 by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #10 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2023) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Stay Proceedings; [Proposed] Order filed by Ur M. Jaddou, Danielle E. Lehman, Alejandro N. Mayorkas. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/13/2023) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ur M. Jaddou, Danielle E. Lehman, Alejandro N. Mayorkas.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/13/2023) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ni Bei. Ur M. Jaddou served on 2/17/2023, answer due 4/18/2023; Danielle E. Lehman served on 2/17/2023, answer due 4/18/2023; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 2/17/2023, answer due 4/18/2023. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/17/2023) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ni Bei.. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/14/2023) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Danielle E. Lehman, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2023) |
Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2023) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/24/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2023) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ni Bei (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/10/2023) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/10/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou, Danielle E. Lehman, Alejandro N. Mayorkas ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17979688.). Filed byNi Bei. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wang, Justin) (Filed on 2/10/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.