Sepulveda v. Goswamy
Plaintiff: Richard Sepulveda
Defendant: Rajan Kumar Goswamy
Case Number: 3:2023cv00799
Filed: February 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Lisa J Cisneros
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Richard Sepulveda (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/19/2023)
April 5, 2023 Filing 9 Notice of Settlement of ADA Access Case by Richard Allen Mac Bride (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 4/5/2023)
March 15, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sepulveda. Rajan Kumar Goswamy served on 3/2/23, answer due 3/23/23. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 3/15/2023) Modified on 3/15/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
March 15, 2023 #Electronic filing error. Filer is reminded to put in the date defendant was served. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #8 Summons Returned Executed filed by Richard Sepulveda. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2023)
March 14, 2023 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Richard Sepulveda.. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 3/14/2023)
March 1, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Richard Sepulveda.. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 3/1/2023)
February 23, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rajan Kumar Goswamy. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2023)
February 23, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2023)
February 23, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/9/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2023)
February 22, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 2/22/2023)
February 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18012732.). Filed byRichard Sepulveda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mac Bride, Richard) (Filed on 2/22/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sepulveda v. Goswamy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Sepulveda
Represented By: Richard Allen Mac Bride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rajan Kumar Goswamy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?