Arellano v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al
| Milao Arellano |
| Paramount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton and Nick D'Abo |
| 3:2023cv00866 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Due to the Court's upcoming trial schedule, the Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/25/2023 is continued to 5/31/2023 at 2:00 p.m. by a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 5/30/2023.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2023) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 5/18/2023. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 5/25/2023 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley by a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 5/24/2023.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2023) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 03/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2023)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Paramount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton.. (Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 3/13/2023) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Paramount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton re #1 Notice of Removal,,,, OF COMPLIANCE RE REMOVAL (Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 5/19/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/26/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/13/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Sheet nature of suit different then docket, if civil cover sheet not correct please refile. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetThis filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #2 Civil Cover Sheet filed by Paramount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Paramount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton (Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 4 Declaration of Nicole A. J. Lang in Support of #1 Notice of Removal,,,, filed byParamount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Emma Luevano in Support of #1 Notice of Removal,,,, filed byParamount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Paramount Pictures Corporation, Mark Scruton . (Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV005336. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18021890). Filed byMark Scruton, Paramount Pictures Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Exhibit 44, #45 Exhibit 45, #46 Exhibit 46, #47 Exhibit 47, #48 Exhibit 48, #49 Exhibit 49, #50 Exhibit 50, #51 Exhibit 51, #52 Exhibit 52, #53 Exhibit 53)(Guzman, Celia) (Filed on 2/24/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
