Chaplin v. Walmart, Inc.
| Nikolas Chaplin |
| Walmart, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00878 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay this Action Pending Completion of Arbitration, #14 MOTION to Dismiss ) DECLARATION OF NIKOLAS CHAPLIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITIONS TO WALMARTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION filed byNikolas Chaplin. (Straub, Craig) (Filed on 4/24/2023) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #14 MOTION to Dismiss ) PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT WALMART INC.S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS filed byNikolas Chaplin. (Straub, Craig) (Filed on 4/24/2023) |
| Filing 15 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay this Action Pending Completion of Arbitration ) PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT WALMART INC.S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND OBJECTION TO PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE DECLARATION OF GARIKEPATI filed byNikolas Chaplin. (Straub, Craig) (Filed on 4/24/2023) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Walmart, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 4/24/2023. Replies due by 5/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 3/27/2023) |
| Filing 13 Declaration of Anil Kumar Garikepati in Support of #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay this Action Pending Completion of Arbitration filed byWalmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Related document(s) #12 ) (Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 3/27/2023) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay this Action Pending Completion of Arbitration filed by Walmart, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 5/24/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 4/24/2023. Replies due by 5/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 3/27/2023) |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 5/30/2023 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 5/23/2023. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/14/2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2023)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on March 13, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2023)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Walmart, Inc... (Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 3/8/2023) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #5 Stipulation to extend time for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including 3/27/2023; Plaintiff to file any opposition to any motion by 4/24/2023; Defendant to file any reply by 5/8/2023. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2023)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Nikolas Chaplin.. (Straub, Craig) (Filed on 3/2/2023) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time To Respond To Initial Complaint filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond To Initial Complaint)(Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/24/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/31/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/14/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Walmart, Inc. (Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 23CV025397. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18026235). Filed byWalmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lowe, Rachel) (Filed on 2/27/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
