Genentech, Inc. v. Biogen MA, Inc.
| Genentech, Inc. |
| Biogen MA, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00909 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Genentech, Inc... (Faucette, Jeffrey) (Filed on 4/4/2023) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/4/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2023) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Biogen MA, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/25/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/1/2023 11:00 AM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/15/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Genentech, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Roche Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Roche Holding Ltd. for Genentech, Inc. (Faucette, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/28/2023) Modified on 3/1/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Faucette, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/28/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Breach of Contract against Biogen MA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18030662.). Filed byGenentech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Faucette, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/28/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Genentech, Inc. v. Biogen MA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Genentech, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey E. Faucette |
| Represented By: | Paul B. Gaffney |
| Represented By: | Thomas S Fletcher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Biogen MA, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
