Gulsoy v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: Candogan Gulsoy
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Acting Director Danielle Lehman
Case Number: 3:2023cv01034
Filed: March 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2023 Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. United States Department of Homeland Security served on 3/20/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
April 6, 2023 Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. United States Department of Homeland Security served on 4/4/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
April 6, 2023 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 4/3/2023, answer due 6/2/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
April 6, 2023 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. Alejandro Mayorkas served on 4/3/2023, answer due 6/2/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
April 6, 2023 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. Danielle Lehman served on 4/3/2023, answer due 6/2/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
April 6, 2023 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 4/3/2023, answer due 6/2/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
April 6, 2023 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Candogan Gulsoy. United States Department of Homeland Security served on 4/3/2023, answer due 6/2/2023. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 4/6/2023)
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 3/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2023)
March 22, 2023 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2023)
March 22, 2023 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Candogan Gulsoy.. (Karlin, Marc) (Filed on 3/22/2023)
March 22, 2023 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/5/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2023)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney William Brian Jacobi representing Plaintiff. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2023)
March 17, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18085377.) filed by Candogan Gulsoy. (Jacobi, William) (Filed on 3/17/2023)
March 9, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Danielle Lehman, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2023)
March 8, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Karlin, Marc) (Filed on 3/8/2023)
March 8, 2023 Filing 3 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2023)
March 7, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/21/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2023)
March 7, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18052274.). Filed byCandogan Gulsoy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Karlin, Marc) (Filed on 3/7/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gulsoy v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candogan Gulsoy
Represented By: Marc Alan Karlin
Represented By: William Brian Jacobi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Director Danielle Lehman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?