(PC) Lovell v. East Oakland Police Department et al
| David Anthony Lovell, II |
| East Oakland Police Department, Highland Hospital, Alameda County, California, Alameda Sheriff, Wellpath Medical Corporation and Dr. Cooper |
| 3:2023cv01451 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| PSLC MWD |
| William H Orrick |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 5/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN CASE. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 5/15/23. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Anthony Lovell, II. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David Anthony Lovell, II. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2023) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Anthony Lovell, II. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2023) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 5/5/2023. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-00479. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/22/2023 TRANSFERRING this matter to USDC, Northern District of California. CASE TRANSFERRED. (Huang, H)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Transfer Order served on David Anthony Lovell II. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 4/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on David Anthony Lovell II. (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by David Anthony Lovell, II. (Rodriguez, E) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by David Anthony Lovell, II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 3/17/2023 (Huang, H). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
