Kazan v. Appreciate Stuff, Inc. et al
| Kerem Kazan |
| Appreciate Stuff, Inc. and Justin Connor |
| 3:2023cv01744 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| William H Orrick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER ON #13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME by Judge William H. Orrick. Appreciate'sdeadline for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is June 21, 2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2023)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Appreciate Stuff, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration in Support)(Trumbull, Samuel) (Filed on 5/31/2023) |
|
Filing 12
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 7/18/2023 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 7/11/2023. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/26/2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2023)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 05/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2023)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Appreciate Stuff, Inc... (Trumbull, Samuel) (Filed on 5/24/2023) |
|
Filing 8
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #6 Stipulation to Extend Time. Deadline for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 5/31/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2023)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/24/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2023) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time filed by Appreciate Stuff, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration)(Trumbull, Samuel) (Filed on 5/10/2023) |
|
Filing 5
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #4 Stipulation to Extend Time. Deadline for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 5/10/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2023)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time filed by Appreciate Stuff, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration in Support)(Trumbull, Samuel) (Filed on 4/18/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/6/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/13/2023 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/26/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California Superior Court, County of San Francisco. Their case number is CGC-23-604889.. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18162860). Filed byAppreciate Stuff, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Trumbull, Samuel) (Filed on 4/12/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
