Estate of Caroline Becker v. Monsanto Company
| Estate of Caroline Becker |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2023cv01909 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Estate of Carolyn Becker] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 5/30/2023) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Estate of Carolyn Becker] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 5/30/2023) |
| Filing 7 Defendant Monsanto Company ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff Estate of Carolyn Becker] byMonsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 5/30/2023) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Minnesota; Case Number 0:23-cv-00835. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2741: District of Minnesota, 0:23-cv-00835-NEB-DJF, Estate of Caroline Becker v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:23-cv-01909-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 392 cc: JPMDL (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2023) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-392) transferring case to the Northern District of California per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria.(CLK) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to JPML regarding case potentially related to MDL #2741 re: #1 Complaint. (kt) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (kt) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. Please use case number 23-cv-835 NEB/DJF.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10174734) filed by Caroline Becker. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estate of Caroline Becker v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Estate of Caroline Becker | |
| Represented By: | Charles H. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
