Cruz et al v. Jaddou
| Irene Cruz, Hector Meza, Vijaykumar Patel, Vamini Patel, YT, SP, Hardikkumar Chaudhari, Sonalben Chaudhari, Maria Aguero Castillo, Santos Medina Montoya, AMM, FNU Samaah and Samiuddin M Abdul |
| Ur M. Jaddou |
| 3:2023cv01956 |
| April 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/31/2023. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2023)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal and Agreement by AMM, Samiuddin M Abdul, Maria Aguero Castillo, Hardikkumar Chaudhari, Sonalben Chaudhari, Irene Cruz, Santos Medina Montoya, Hector Meza, Vamini Patel, Vijaykumar Patel, SP, FNU Samaah, YT (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
| Filing 12 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 5/25/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2023) (bw, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2023) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by AMM, Samiuddin M Abdul, Maria Aguero Castillo, Hardikkumar Chaudhari, Sonalben Chaudhari, Irene Cruz, Santos Medina Montoya, Hector Meza, Vamini Patel, Vijaykumar Patel, SP, FNU Samaah, YT.. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 5/24/2023) |
| Filing 8 FINAL CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/7/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2023) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/23/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2023) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2023) |
| Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/8/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2023) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 4/22/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by AMM, Samiuddin M Abdul, Maria Aguero Castillo, Hardikkumar Chaudhari, Sonalben Chaudhari, Irene Cruz, Santos Medina Montoya, Hector Meza, Vamini Patel, Vijaykumar Patel, SP, FNU Samaah, YT (Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 4/22/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18197817.). Filed bySP, AMM, Vijaykumar Patel, Hardikkumar Chaudhari, Maria Aguero Castillo, FNU Samaah, Hector Meza, Sonalben Chaudhari, Vamini Patel, Irene Cruz, Samiuddin M Abdul, Santos Medina Montoya, YT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: BFD Policies, #2 Exhibit B: Plaintiffs' Info, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wolfsdorf, Bernard) (Filed on 4/22/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
