Carra v. Sutter Bay Hospitals dba Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital et al
| Christina Carra |
| Sutter Bay Hospitals dba Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital, Christopher Strunk and Sutter Bay Hospitals doing business as Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital |
| 3:2023cv02347 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #7 Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend. Amended complaint is due by July 24, 2023. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2023)
|
| Filing 17 REPLY (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ) filed bySutter Bay Hospitals. (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ) filed byChristina Carra. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pleading/Complaint Packet)(Rossa, Marilyn) (Filed on 6/20/2023) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Responses due by 6/19/2023. Replies due by 6/26/2023. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2023)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Christina Carra. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service, #3 Envelope)(sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE PROVIDING ZOOM ACCESS INFORMATION. The Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/24/2023 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corleywill be held by a Zoom videoconference. Joint statement is due by 8/17/2023. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 8/23/2023.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2023) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING DATE. Defendants' #7 Motion to Dismiss is reset for 7/6/2023 at 10:00 a.m. in San Francisco, Courtroom 08, 19th Floor before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2023) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 5/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2023)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2023) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 5/26/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Christopher Strunk, Sutter Bay Hospitals.. (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 5/19/2023) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Christopher Strunk, Sutter Bay Hospitals. Motion Hearing set for 7/6/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Responses due by 6/2/2023. Replies due by 6/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 5/19/2023) Modified on 5/23/2023 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/10/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/17/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2023) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/30/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2023) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Removal by Christopher Strunk, Sutter Bay Hospitals dba Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 5/12/2023) Modified on 5/17/2023 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Christopher Strunk, Sutter Bay Hospitals dba Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 5/12/2023) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Christopher Strunk, Sutter Bay Hospitals dba Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital . (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 5/12/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sonoma County Superior Court. Their case number is SCV-272845. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18261831). Filed by Christopher Strunk, Sutter Bay Hospitals dba Sutter San Rosa Regional Hospital. (Kitzes, Daniel) (Filed on 5/12/2023) Modified on 5/17/2023 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
