Freeman v. Apple, Inc.
Lynne Freeman |
Apple, Inc. and DOES 1-10 |
3:2023cv02426 |
May 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-1(b), the #12 Motion to Transfer has been determined to be appropriate for disposition without oral argument. As such, the hearing set for 7/19/2023 is VACATED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2023) |
Filing 14 REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Transfer Case ) filed byApple, Inc.. (Wolff, Nancy) (Filed on 6/29/2023) |
Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Transfer Case ) filed byLynne Freeman. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Apple, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/19/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 6/28/2023. Replies due by 7/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wolff, Nancy) (Filed on 6/14/2023) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nancy Evelyn Wolff (Wolff, Nancy) (Filed on 6/9/2023) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lynne Freeman. Apple, Inc. served on 5/25/2023, answer due 6/15/2023. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Lynne Freeman re Related Cases (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 5/19/2023) |
Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2023) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc.. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2023) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/22/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2023) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2023) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 5/17/2023) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a copyright (cc: form mailed to register). (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 5/17/2023) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Lynne Freeman (Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 5/17/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., DOES 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18276235.). Filed byLynne Freeman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Doniger, Stephen) (Filed on 5/17/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.