Ramirez v. Healthright 360 et al
| Jamaal Ramirez |
| Healthright 360 and Healthright 360 Foundation |
| 3:2023cv02601 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Lisa J Cisneros |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 07/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2023)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2023) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Healthright 360, Healthright 360 Foundation.. (Brooks, JoAnna) (Filed on 7/10/2023) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jamaal Ramirez.. (Lapuyade, Jean-Claude) (Filed on 6/27/2023) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/10/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
|
Filing 8
Order by Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros granting #7 Stipulation to Stay Case.(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2023)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Case filed by Jamaal Ramirez, Healthright 360 and Healthright 360 Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion and Stipulation to Stay Case)(Lapuyade, Jean-Claude) (Filed on 6/21/2023) Modified on 6/21/2023 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/23/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/17/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/24/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/8/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Healthright 360, Healthright 360 Foundation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Brooks, JoAnna) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Healthright 360, Healthright 360 Foundation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Brooks, JoAnna) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with Jury Demand, No Process) from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-23-605974. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18303078). Filed byHealthright 360 Foundation, Healthright 360. (Attachments: #1 Declaration JoAnna L. Brooks, #2 Declaration Nilab Nawabi, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Brooks, JoAnna) (Filed on 5/25/2023) Modified on 5/26/2023 (jrs, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
