Pizana v. El Palenque Grill, LLC. et al
Marco Antonio Pizana |
El Palenque Grill, LLC. and Veronica Garcia |
3:2023cv02742 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Sallie Kim |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Dore, James) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Antonio Pizana. Veronica Garcia served on 6/10/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Dore, James) (Filed on 7/17/2023) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marco Antonio Pizana. El Palenque Grill, LLC. served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Dore, James) (Filed on 7/17/2023) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Veronica Garcia. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2023) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant Veronica Garcia shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/14/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/14/2023. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Veronica Garcia. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2023) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Marco Antonio Pizana.. (Dore, James) (Filed on 6/9/2023) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/4/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2023) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to El Palenque Grill, LLC., Veronica Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2023) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/16/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Dore, James) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Dore, James) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury demand against El Palenque Grill, LLC., Veronica Garcia ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18324752.). Filed by Marco Antonio Pizana. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dore, James) (Filed on 6/2/2023) Modified on 6/5/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.