Gutknecht v. Tech Mahindra Americas Inc.
Kristi Gutknecht |
Tech Mahindra Americas Inc. |
3:2023cv02743 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tech Mahindra Americas Inc... (Orozco, Pablo) (Filed on 6/16/2023) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tech Mahindra Americas Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Tech Mahindra Limited for Tech Mahindra Americas Inc.. (Orozco, Pablo) (Filed on 6/8/2023) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byTech Mahindra Americas Inc.. (Orozco, Pablo) (Filed on 6/8/2023) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/24/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/31/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/16/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Alameda County. Their case number is 23cv031992. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18324778). Filed byTech Mahindra Americas Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Pablo Orozco, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint/state court docs, #3 Declaration of Anitha Ramesh, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Orozco, Pablo) (Filed on 6/2/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gutknecht v. Tech Mahindra Americas Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kristi Gutknecht | |
Represented By: | Dylan Hackett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tech Mahindra Americas Inc. | |
Represented By: | Pablo Orozco |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.